
Verified SofaScore Top 14 standings after four rounds, retrieved before the 2 October cutoff: Vannes 14th on 0, Section Paloise 3rd on 14. The early table is context; its points gap is not scored again after the same results have already influenced form.
| Pos | Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | +61 | 15 | |
| 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | +26 | 14 | |
| 3 | 4 | 3 | 1 | +46 | 14 | |
| 4 | 4 | 3 | 1 | -16 | 13 | |
| 5 | 4 | 2 | 2 | +40 | 10 | |
| 6 | 4 | 2 | 2 | -3 | 10 | |
| 7 | 4 | 2 | 2 | +21 | 9 | |
| 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | -16 | 9 | |
| 9 | 4 | 2 | 2 | -12 | 9 | |
| 10 | 4 | 2 | 2 | -17 | 8 | |
| 11 | 4 | 2 | 2 | -28 | 8 | |
| 12 | 4 | 1 | 3 | +14 | 8 | |
| 13 | 4 | 1 | 3 | -69 | 5 | |
| 14 | 4 | 0 | 4 | -47 | 0 |
Current 2026/27 season: 4 completed matches, 2026-09-05–2026-09-26, 65 for and 112 against. Vannes have lost all four league games by nine, fourteen, six and eighteen. Pau have three wins in four with a combined points difference of +46, though the 25–51 Lyon defeat shows their attack does not remove all risk.
Current 2026/27 season: 4 completed matches, 2026-09-05–2026-09-26, 161 for and 115 against. The latest result was Section Paloise 39–17 Stade Rochelais. The displayed sample contains 2 home wins from 2 home games and 1 away wins; opponent strength, venue and changed selections limit how directly the old results transfer.
0 – 0 – 2
Vannes wins · Draws · Section Paloise wins; 2 Top 14 meetings, all venues, 2024-12-28–2025-05-31
Pau won both retrieved Top 14 meetings, 48–24 and 52–26. The sample is only two matches and predates the current season, so the grade is strong directional evidence with an explicit small-sample limit. This is the stated retrieved sample, not an all-time record.
| Date | Competition | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 2025-05-31 | Top 14 | Vannes 26–52 Section Paloise |
| 2024-12-28 | Top 14 | Section Paloise 48–24 Vannes |
Average score in the last 6 meetings: Vannes 25.0 – Section Paloise 50.0 across these 2 meetings, oriented to the report teams regardless of venue.
Retrieved Top 14 sample within the last twelve months, 4 games, 2026-09-05–2026-09-26; partial provider history, not a claim to cover every fixture. 2026-09-26: RC Toulonnais 28–10 Vannes; 2026-09-19: Vannes 23–29 Stade Toulousain; 2026-09-12: Vannes 12–26 Montpellier; 2026-09-05: Castres Olympique 29–20 Vannes
Vannes scored 65 and conceded 112 in this explicitly bounded sample. Current selections are still unverified, so older personnel advantages are not carried into the scorecard.
Retrieved Top 14 sample within the last twelve months, 27 games, 2025-10-04–2026-09-26; partial provider history, not a claim to cover every fixture. 2026-09-26: Section Paloise 39–17 Stade Rochelais; 2026-09-19: Lyon 51–25 Section Paloise; 2026-09-12: Section Paloise 70–28 Bayonne; 2026-09-05: Montpellier 19–27 Section Paloise; 2026-06-13: Section Paloise 31–33 Racing 92; 2026-06-06: Section Paloise 71–35 Montauban; 2026-05-30: Montpellier 26–18 Section Paloise; 2026-05-16: Section Paloise 24–19 Clermont; 2026-05-09: Section Paloise 27–15 Castres Olympique; 2026-04-25: Stade Francais Paris 34–32 Section Paloise; 2026-04-18: Bayonne 22–54 Section Paloise; 2026-03-28: Section Paloise 27–17 Racing 92; 2026-03-21: Stade Rochelais 20–6 Section Paloise; 2026-03-01: Section Paloise 39–17 Bordeaux-Bègles; 2026-02-22: USA Perpignan 40–24 Section Paloise; 2026-02-01: Section Paloise 32–12 RC Toulonnais; 2026-01-24: Stade Toulousain 59–22 Section Paloise; 2026-01-03: Lyon 22–17 Section Paloise; 2025-12-28: Section Paloise 35–33 Montpellier; 2025-12-20: Montauban 17–53 Section Paloise; 2025-11-30: Section Paloise 53–33 Stade Rochelais; 2025-11-21: Bordeaux-Bègles 33–34 Section Paloise; 2025-11-01: Section Paloise 27–23 USA Perpignan; 2025-10-25: Racing 92 15–10 Section Paloise; 2025-10-18: Section Paloise 30–26 Stade Toulousain; 2025-10-11: Section Paloise 47–24 Bayonne; 2025-10-04: RC Toulonnais 33–17 Section Paloise
Section Paloise scored 891 and conceded 723 in this explicitly bounded sample. Current selections are still unverified, so older personnel advantages are not carried into the scorecard.
Selected XV and bench unverified at the 2 October 2026, 16:52 SAST cutoff. Checked rugbyclubvannes.bzh, the official LNR round-five match sheet and focused current-week team searches; no selected team was verified. Probable teams, training groups and previous-round selections are excluded, leaving personnel dimensions ungraded.
Selected XV and bench unverified at the 2 October 2026, 16:52 SAST cutoff. Checked section-paloise.com, the official LNR round-five match sheet and focused current-week team searches; no selected team was verified. Probable teams, training groups and previous-round selections are excluded, leaving personnel dimensions ungraded.
No selected-unit edge is asserted before the XVs and benches are verified; “close” in these placeholder rows means ungraded. Joe Simmonds (Section Paloise) has 46 points in 4 Top 14 appearances at this four-round cutoff; Rodrigo Marta (Section Paloise) has 30 points in 4 Top 14 appearances at this four-round cutoff. These are past contributions, not proof that either player is selected this weekend. Verified selections could strengthen Pau’s case or show a major away rotation; until then the disagreement remains unresolved. The league results remain the only graded basis beyond venue and head-to-head.
The legacy probability formula still leans narrowly to Vannes, but that is a conflicted model output rather than a resolved recommendation. Pau have the stronger result-based case, and the raw margin calculation points away. Vannes’ six-point home loss to Toulouse shows resistance, not evidence that they should be favourites. The seven-dimension net is -5; the unmodified two-way house output is 55% for Vannes, with no separate draw probability.
Both XVs and benches are unverified, and there is no personnel evidence to reconcile the disagreement. Pau’s three wins and the two decisive rivalry wins are substantial counterevidence to the home prior. The schema-required one-point home projection is retained only as a visibly labelled probability-model lean; this preview does not claim the winner question is settled.
Conflicted — Vannes by 1 as a probability-model lean only; the winner disagreement is unresolved and both selections remain unverified.
Conflicted: Home and away selected XVs and benches; three personnel dimensions are ungraded.; Raw probability and raw margin point to different winners; unresolved.
legacy-house-2026-09-v1; raw home probability 0.5503, raw home margin -1.25. Unresolved legacy probability/margin conflict; one-point home projection is a labelled probability-model lean, not a resolved recommendation.
Median 50.5 points across 8 distinct completed Top 14 games, 2026-09-05–2026-09-26; no personnel or weather adjustment is applied because selections are unverified. Rounded to an integer total of 51 compatible with the 1-point projection. This is a scoring projection, not a validated total or interval.
The home prior produces a home probability despite a negative non-venue net. The Toulouse home loss supplies resistance evidence but does not outweigh Pau’s form and two decisive meetings. No independent case warrants presenting the home lean as a resolved recommendation.
The ±5-point editorial band is not a validated confidence interval; its coverage has not been measured.