
Opening European round: no completed pool results; unavailable structured standings are left empty and previous-season tables are not substituted.
| Pos | Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
|---|
United Rugby Championship only: 5 completed matches, 2026-05-09 to 2026-10-09; 138 for and 142 against. Dragons scored 38 against Scarlets and 31 against Ospreys, yet conceded 64 across those two home games. They have an attack to work with and a defensive problem that a new competition will not solve.
Top 14 only: 5 completed matches, 2026-09-12 to 2026-10-10; 140 for and 171 against. The home wins over Bordeaux and Vannes matter, but the away defeats at Montpellier and Racing expose a sharp venue split. The opponents and venues make a raw three-wins-in-five comparison incomplete.
1 – 0 – 3
Dragons RFC wins · Draws · Perpignan wins (4 retrieved meetings, all venues)
4 most recent verified meetings in the retrieved sample (2011-11-17 to 2025-12-07), all venues: Dragons RFC 1 wins, 0 draws, Perpignan 3 wins. Older games have limited relevance to the current selections.
| Date | Competition | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-07 | Challenge Cup | Perpignan 41–17 Dragons RFC |
| 2021-12-11 | Challenge Cup | Perpignan 22–16 Dragons RFC |
| 2012-01-14 | Challenge Cup | Perpignan 27–13 Dragons RFC |
| 2011-11-17 | Challenge Cup | Dragons RFC 23–13 Perpignan |
Average score in the last 6 meetings: Dragons RFC 17.3 – Perpignan 25.8 across this 4-match sample.
Retrieved United Rugby Championship results inside 16 October 2025–2026-10-16: 2026-10-09: Dragons RFC 31–38 Ospreys; 2026-10-03: Dragons RFC 38–26 Scarlets; 2026-09-25: Benetton 19–19 Dragons RFC; 2026-05-16: Scarlets 35–35 Dragons RFC; 2026-05-09: Dragons RFC 15–24 Edinburgh; 2026-04-24: Zebre Parma 18–19 Dragons RFC; 2026-04-17: Dragons RFC 7–47 Bulls; 2026-03-28: Lions 42–26 Dragons RFC; 2026-03-22: Stormers 29–21 Dragons RFC; 2026-02-28: Dragons RFC 15–15 Benetton; 2026-01-31: Ospreys 19–13 Dragons RFC; 2026-01-23: Munster 22–20 Dragons RFC; 2026-01-01: Dragons RFC 28–5 Scarlets; 2025-12-26: Cardiff Rugby 22–19 Dragons RFC; 2025-12-20: Dragons RFC 48–28 Connacht; 2025-11-28: Dragons RFC 10–24 Leinster; 2025-10-25: Dragons RFC 19–19 Ospreys; 2025-10-17: Dragons RFC 17–24 Cardiff Rugby.
A retrieved sample within twelve months, not a claim of complete season coverage. Older matches are context and are not counted a second time in the scorecard.
Retrieved Top 14 results inside 16 October 2025–2026-10-16: 2026-10-10: Perpignan 21–12 Vannes; 2026-10-03: Racing 92 55–25 Perpignan; 2026-09-26: Perpignan 38–25 Bordeaux-Bègles; 2026-09-19: Montpellier 50–13 Perpignan; 2026-09-12: Perpignan 43–29 Castres Olympique; 2026-09-05: Stade Français 28–26 Perpignan; 2026-06-14: Provence Rugby 24–47 Perpignan; 2026-06-06: Bayonne 52–7 Perpignan; 2026-05-30: Perpignan 29–27 Castres Olympique; 2026-05-16: Bordeaux-Bègles 37–32 Perpignan; 2026-05-09: Clermont 45–14 Perpignan; 2026-04-25: Perpignan 29–31 La Rochelle; 2026-04-18: Montpellier 42–31 Perpignan; 2026-03-28: Perpignan 36–20 Toulon; 2026-03-21: Perpignan 28–32 Lyon; 2026-02-28: Stade Français 42–21 Perpignan; 2026-02-22: Perpignan 40–24 Pau; 2026-01-31: Racing 92 37–31 Perpignan; 2026-01-24: Perpignan 31–8 Montauban; 2026-01-03: Perpignan 30–27 Toulouse; 2025-12-28: Toulon 31–16 Perpignan; 2025-12-20: Perpignan 26–20 Clermont; 2025-11-29: Castres Olympique 23–7 Perpignan; 2025-11-22: Perpignan 0–28 Montpellier; 2025-11-01: Pau 27–23 Perpignan; 2025-10-25: Montauban 29–22 Perpignan; 2025-10-18: Perpignan 12–27 Bordeaux-Bègles.
A retrieved sample within twelve months, not a claim of complete season coverage. Opponents and venues vary; no extra score is awarded for repeating the short form window.
Official 15 October selection: Dyer reaches 100 appearances, Lloyd starts at ten and de Beer moves to fullback. Dee, Wyn Jones and Dillon Lewis cover the replacement front row.
Unverified as of 2026-10-16T14:11:08.310Z. Checked https://www.usap.fr/, the Flashscore details feed and focused searches for Perpignan and their opponent on this fixture’s date; no complete, authoritative match-day XV and bench could be established in the retrieved material. Arrays stay empty and personnel dimensions are ungraded.
No verified comparative scrum/lineout performance advantage; zero is ungraded when the selected opposition is missing, not proof of equality. No defensible net selected-backline edge established; unverified opposition stays ungraded rather than being replaced with a season roster. No measured net squad-depth advantage is established; zero is an ungraded placeholder where a selected side is unverified. “Close” on an unverified unit is an ungraded display placeholder, not evidence of equality.
Dragons can make this awkward at Rodney Parade, but there is little room for a grand claim. Perpignan’s 38–25 win over Bordeaux and 21–12 win over Vannes beat the visitors’ reputation for poor travelling as evidence. The home model lean survives, with Dyer and Rosser giving Dragons routes to attack the edges.
Perpignan’s last two retrieved away league games ended 13–50 at Montpellier and 25–55 at Racing. That offers Dragons a route, but the visitors’ complete match-day selection is unverified here. A 41–17 defeat in the most recent meeting is the warning against treating Newport alone as enough. Scorecard net +0; raw house home probability 65.3%, raw home margin 3.00. The 1–8-point band is an editorial range, not a statistical confidence interval. Combined-total prior from 10 distinct completed matches in the two explicit form windows, 2026-05-09 to 2026-10-10: median 63.5 points. The projected 65 adjusts only for integer score parity with the rounded 3-point margin. Cross-competition and selection changes limit transfer; no unsupported weather adjustment.
Provisional — Dragons RFC by 3 — Perpignan selected XV and bench unverified; personnel comparison incomplete.
Dragons RFC points for–against in the explicitly listed 5-match form window.
Perpignan points for–against in the explicitly listed 5-match form window.
Checked 2026-10-16T14:11:08.310Z. Perpignan selected XV and bench unverified; personnel comparison incomplete.